Open access to scholarly knowledge in the digital eraOpinion

Open access to scholarly knowledge in the digital era: Foreword and series overview

This article is the foreword of a series of articles summarising the book Reassembling Scholarly Communications: Histories, Infrastructures, and Global Politics of Open Access.

Knowledge sharing is promoted as a fundamental aspect of knowledge management (KM), yet, hypocritically, many KM research papers are locked away behind journal paywalls where the practitioners who can potentially benefit from their findings cannot access them, and the claims being presented in the research cannot be critically evaluated.

In response, RealKM Magazine actively promotes and supports the concepts of open knowledge and open KM. We do this through:

  • always making our own content freely accessible
  • actively supporting and promoting the work of researchers who have chosen to publish their work open access, and in particularly Creative Commons open access

But open access isn’t that simple

However, the issue of providing open access to academic knowledge isn’t as simple as the black and white perspective of either making research open access or not.

A newly published volume1 from MIT Press explores the far more complicated reality. In the volume, editors Martin Paul Eve and Jonathan Grey put forward perspectives and case studies that explore the histories of scholarly communications and:

  • question the dominant narrative of the emergence of open access
  • examine how contemporary practices might suggest other alternative arrangements and trajectories, embedding different values and conceptions of the role of scholarship in the contemporary world
  • explore the futures that might emerge from such differential thought.

This RealKM Magazine series will summarise the main points from the introduction, each of the 25 chapters, and the conclusion of the book. This has been made possible by the publication of the volume as Creative Commons open access.

Overview of the series

This series is divided into six sections: colonial influences, epistemologies, publics and politics, archives and preservation, infrastructures and platforms, and global communities.

Introduction

Section 1: Colonial influences

This section reflects upon issues of global inequality and paints a very different picture to the scene with which those from the Global North may be familiar:

1.1 – The alienation of African knowledge – open access as a pharmakon

1.2 – Scholarly communications and social justice

1.3 – A locally-driven “library as a publisher” service for Africa

1.4 – Can open scholarly practices redress injustices in knowledge-making?

Section 2: Knowledge cultures

The second section focuses on knowledge cultures; the ways in which we think about knowledge itself and how this shapes our understandings of digital and open transformations of research publishing:

2.1 – Insights for today from the historical origins of modern copyright

2.2 – How does a format make a public?

2.3 – The evolving role of readers in peer review

2.4 – The making of empirical knowledge – recipes, craft, and scholarly communication.

Section 3: Publics and politics

The third section turns to different audiences and publics, and the politics of the open dissemination of research work:

3.1 – The Royal Society and the noncommercial circulation of knowledge

3.2 – The political histories of UK public libraries and access to knowledge

3.3 – Libraries and their publics in the United States

3.4 – Open access, “publicity,” and democratic knowledge.

Section 4: Archives and preservation

The fourth section turns its focus to archives and preservation:

4. 1 – Libraries, museums, and archives as speculative knowledge infrastructure

4.2 – Preserving the past for the future – whose past? Everyone’s future

4.3 – Is there a text in these data? The digital humanities and preserving the evidence

4.4 – Accessing the past, or should archives provide open access?

Section 5: Infrastructures and platforms

The fifth section looks at infrastructures and platforms:

5.1 – Infrastructural experiments and the politics of open access

5.2 – The platformisation of open

5.3 – Reading scholarship digitally

5.4 – Toward linked open data for Latin America

5.5 – The pasts, presents, and futures of SciELO.

Section 6: Global Communities

The last section is dedicated to ideas of community and global community in scholarly communication paradigms:

6.1 – Not self-indulgence, but self-preservation – open access and the ethics of care

6.2 – Toward a global open access scholarly communications system – A developing region perspective

6.3 – Learned societies, humanities publishing, and scholarly communication in the UK

6.4 – Not all networks – toward open, sustainable research communities.

Conclusion


Next part: Introduction.

Article source: Eve, M. P., & Gray, J. (Eds.) (2020). Reassembling scholarly communications: Histories, infrastructures, and global politics of Open Access. MIT Press. CC BY 4.0.

Reference:

  1. Eve, M. P., & Gray, J. (Eds.) (2020). Reassembling scholarly communications: Histories, infrastructures, and global politics of Open Access. MIT Press.

Also published on Medium.

Bruce Boyes

Bruce Boyes (www.bruceboyes.info) is editor, lead writer, and a director of the award-winning RealKM Magazine (www.realkm.com), and a knowledge management (KM), environmental management, and project management consultant. He holds a Master of Environmental Management with Distinction, and his expertise and experience includes knowledge management (KM), environmental management, project management, stakeholder engagement, teaching and training, communications, research, and writing and editing. With a demonstrated ability to identify and implement innovative solutions to social and ecological complexity, Bruce's many career highlights include establishing RealKM Magazine as an award-winning resource, using agile and knowledge management approaches to oversee an award-winning $77.4 million western Sydney river recovery program, leading a knowledge strategy process for Australia's 56 natural resource management (NRM) regional organisations, pioneering collaborative learning and governance approaches to support the sustainable management of landscapes and catchments, and initiating and teaching two new knowledge management subjects at Shanxi University in China.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Back to top button