Menu

Skip to content
  • About us
  • Patrons
  • Store
  • Subscribe to Weekly Wrap
  • How to contribute
  • Editorial guidelines
  • Community standards
  • Privacy statement
  • Contact
Header image

RealKMLogo

Evidence based. Practical results.

Menu

Skip to content
  • Home
  • In the news
    • Book reviews and releases
    • Top 100 most-discussed journal articles of 2018
    • Top 100 most-discussed journal articles of 2017
    • Top 100 most-discussed journal articles of 2016
  • ABCs of KM
    • Evidence-based knowledge management
    • Professional accreditation for knowledge managers
    • KM standard – ISO 30401 knowledge management systems
    • Co-creative approaches to knowledge production and implementation series
    • Cultural awareness in KM
    • KM in international development
    • Taking knowledge management to the next level
    • Educating knowledge managers series
    • KM in small and medium enterprises (SMEs)
    • KM in the building and construction industries
  • Brain power
    • Change hacks series
    • Agile decision-making series
    • Personality & technical knowledge management systems (TKMS) series
    • The worst mental health killer you probably know nothing about
  • Systems and complexity
    • Case studies in complexity series
    • Managing in the face of complexity series
    • Planning and strategy development in the face of complexity series
    • Exploring the science of complexity series
    • Getting to the heart of the problems with Boeing, Takata, and Toyota
    • Simplistic solutions to complex problems turns behavioural science into a dangerous pseudoscience
    • Stakeholder and community engagement
    • Systems thinking and modelling series
  • Tools & tech
  • Opinion
    • #NotMyDebt series
    • Critical Eye
    • Quality of science and science communication
    • Thinking is hard series
    • The case for indigenous knowledge systems and knowledge sovereignty
Robo-debt

Magic skills: Leadership styles and community-based knowledge management (#NotMyDebt series part 3)

“We’ve done a lot, but we’ve maintained a singular focus. I would continually just bring us back: ‘we just focus on robodebt, we just focus on robodebt.’ Otherwise you do too much and burn out.”

Posted by Meredith Lewis on 29 November 2019 in Featured Stories, NotMyDebt, Opinion | 45 Views

This article is part 3 and the final part of a series of articles looking at the #NotMyDebt movement from a knowledge management perspective.

“What I really have loved about this is that there has been a real building of community because you’ve got people that otherwise wouldn’t have necessarily mixed with each other that have mixed with each other, and then you see the evening out of power, dynamics or expertise.” – Lyndsey Jackson

It was interesting to me that, during our interview about #NotMyDebt, both its leader – Community Builder and Digital Strategist Lyndsey Jackson – and I stumbled somewhat whenever we used the word ‘leader.’ That Lyndsey is the leader of #NotMyDebt – a highly effective and dynamic movement powered by a network of volunteers – cannot be in any doubt. She came up with the idea about starting it, for one thing. When the robodebt controversy arose, whereby thousands of disadvantaged people have been unexpectedly hit with debts from the government that they may not even owe, Lyndsey saw that there was a need to be filled:

LJ: “So when (robodebt) started making headlines, it did seem like one of those spaces where because I’ve worked with Not-for-Profits and governments for over 10 years doing websites I knew that it would be really difficult and slow for an organization to respond to this. And it was the holiday time (and the Not-for-Profit sector was either away or functioning on minimal staff). I thought there are enough ingredients in place to at the very least start to build a website that would curate information, news, blog posts, things like that, and just starting to put it in one central place. To see if we could break down what it was that was happening.”

When the website and social media accounts were set up, and the movement was underway, Lyndsey was the mainstay who kept an enthusiastic network of volunteers supported and focused.

Still, I do understand why we stumbled over the word ‘leader’ with its commonly held association of top-down dominance. We are both influenced by work in community, where community development principles dictate that good leadership is a form of facilitation; a leader in that world should be a supportive, rather than an authority, figure. Lyndsey describes herself as a community builder, having worked in regional communities (IT skill building) and also in online communities:

LJ: “One of the things being in tech is that I’m quite influenced by open source communities. That’s really one of the biggest examples of a community building activity where you have free and open access to the source code. So anyone can look and anyone can see what’s there and anyone can take it. And if they want to build on it, then there’s information and there’s documents and there’s ‘how-tos’. I mean, there’s still gatekeeping around that and there’s still restrictions as far as ability and access and things like that. But on the whole, the project thrives because if you care enough and you’re interested enough you can pick it up and you can start to contribute. So I’m really influenced by that and I think a lot about how we can apply that to systems, organizations, digital transformation, communities, that sort of thing.”

The community that has formed around #NotMyDebt is diverse, ranging from the disadvantaged to the comfortably privileged. People participate because they have received a debt and are desperate for help or support, or because they are less personally afflicted but angered and worried by what they see as poor governance and a gross injustice meted out by our own government. This is a community providing various forms of knowledge: stories of lived experience of receiving and challenging Centrelink and debt collectors, articles and op-eds, formal legal and financial information, or tweeted opinions. The remarkable thing is that this community works so well together. This is due in no small part to the work of the volunteers who run the website and Twitter and Facebook forums, melding these disparate but equally essential forms of information together into an effective whole.

During a preparatory phone conversation Lyndsey had referred to leadership as being a kind of facilitation. Interested in how she has used this style of leadership to keep the #NotMyDebt juggernaut on track, I invited her to expand on that during our interview:

LJ: “I guess the way that I’ve approached leadership is to lead from behind. You encourage people, you encourage their strengths. You remove blockers so that they can do the things that they want to do and that they want to do really well. And that’s probably one of the main things that I would do: if there was a blocker or if there was conflict or if a door needed opening, then I could help to do that and we could move through things really quickly. But it is really about enabling others and what it is that they really want to or can do. And yeah, that is kind of like a leadership quote: a good leader is one that at the end of the day, when everything’s built, people stand around and say, you know, we did this all ourselves.”

As well as being generous and self-effacing, there is a pragmatic side to this approach to leadership:

LJ: “I come from a regional background where you really need to be able to achieve stuff, but there’s also something around sustainability and self-preservation as well. So if I’m the single point of failing, then if I burn out or if I have to step away or if I can’t do it anymore then the project collapses. So you make sure that it’s about supporting everyone, especially because, in the end, this (robodebt) has gone on for so long.”

So leading from behind empowers and supports a community. But how does this relate to knowledge management?

LJ: “The other thing is that it is about curation and facilitation of people and what it is that they want to bring in – their knowledge. There’s been a lot of micro volunteering in (#NotMyDebt). Anyone that messaged that they were interested (in volunteering), I would say what’s your magic skill? Just tell me really quickly what you do and what you want to be doing, what your interest is here.”

As an example of a volunteer with a magic skill, Lyndsey mentions:

LJ: “… Amy Patterson and her ability to edit content, but also to edit according to the tone of community members and the audience. And then to watch the language in the conversation that unfolds on certain platforms and then edit content to mimic that or to respond to that; certainly the best that I’ve ever seen, the best that I’ve ever worked with. So she’s been really instrumental.”

A feature of the body of knowledge curated by #NotMyDebt was how fluently and effectively it was made available to the community to use, either for the purposes of appealing a debt, analysing how the controversy came about, or advocating against it. The website and social media forums were used to optimal effect, and this without being resourced except primarily by volunteer labour that, understandably, ebbed and flowed:

LJ: “In the first month (after #NotMyDebt started) people were on holidays, so there just seemed to be this group of people that were around and not doing much and after an activity. And then the Senate inquiry happens so then you get this new group of people that come in, and then everything settles down and people start to go back to their own lives. And then from time to time people pop up and they offer something.”

In order to best utilise the tacit and explicit knowledge of the volunteers, who came and went, but who built, wrote, edited, designed, convened and moderated a range of knowledge and information spread across different platforms, Lyndsey drew on her earlier influences of regional community work and involvement in crowdsourcing. Her leadership style was obviously inspiring and empowering, but how did she maintain a healthy balance between keeping the #NotMyDebt ecosystem focussed and allowing individuals space to deploy their magic skills?

LJ: “You will always have people that will give you their ideas. But you won’t always get the people that will do the work. So when you want to move fast you have to quickly figure out who’s got the ideas and who will do the work, and just focus on the people that will do the work. Otherwise you would just be discussing the ideas and never get anything done and stay focused. We’ve done a lot, but we’ve maintained a singular focus. So when… there’s all these other potential ideas and things we could do, I would continually just bring us back: ‘we just focus on robodebt, we just focus on robodebt.’ And that’s also been necessary for the longevity of volunteers as well. Otherwise you do too much and burn out.”

Traditional leadership in conventional organizations can be about gatekeeping and hoarding knowledge. #NotMyDebt flipped that model in order to keep knowledge circulating so that it could motivate action, inspire interest (or outrage), inform and empower. Lyndsey has some magic skills of her own, one of which was to implement the right kind of leadership to give the knowledge vested in #NotMyDebt currency and power.

Editor’s note:

Last week, the Australian Government Department of Human Services announced that the robodebt program will be substantially altered, after the government committed to abandoning sole reliance on the controversial “income-averaging” method and instead require additional proof before demanding welfare recipients pay back alleged debts. The department also revealed it would review all existing alleged debts and freeze existing debt recovery pending the review.

Then yesterday it was reported that the Australian Government has settled a landmark challenge against the robodebt program, conceding a $2,500 debt raised against Deanna Amato was not lawful because it relied on income averaging.

These actions confirm that robodebt was poor policy that should never have been implemented in the first place, and highlight the value of community groups using knowledge to raise awareness of and challenge poor policy decisions.

Header image source: © John Shakespeare, used by permission.

0.0
00
Posted in Featured Stories, NotMyDebt, Opinion | Tagged Centrelink, NotMyDebt, robodebt

About the Author / Source

avatar

Meredith Lewis

As an experienced facilitator, interviewer, trainer, and writer, Meredith Lewis is able to open up meaningful dialogue, analyse emergent narratives, and synthesise themes and issues into meaningful insights, implementable recommendations, and useful content. Drawing on 30 years’ experience in the public, creative, and community sectors, Meredith is a boundary spanner of imagination, originality, and empathy who can always bring a unique perspective to the issues she researches and writes about.

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • URL

Related Posts

Robo-debtA space to talk into: community building, knowledge management, and robodebt (#NotMyDebt series part 2)→

Robo-debtGiving language to the people: what is #NotMyDebt? (#NotMyDebt series part 1)→

Robo-debtBlame aversion versus risk aversion (#NotMyDebt series background)→

Editorial: Failure demand at the heart of dissatisfaction with Centrelink→

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS Feed
  • Twitter

Many Thanks To Our Patrons!

Many thanks to all of our great patrons for your generous support, and a very special thank you to our Platinum Patrons:

  • Stephen Bounds
  • Dr Arthur Shelley

To find out all about our patrons, and how you can join them, please visit our RealKM Patrons page.

Become a Patron

Subscribe to Weekly Wrap

Latest Stories

  • How the right people are key to successful brainstorming

    9 December 2019 / Adi Gaskell
  • Managing in the face of complexity

    Managing in the face of complexity (part 4.1): Appropriate approaches – 1. Cynefin framework

    8 December 2019 / Richard Hummelbrunner and Harry Jones
  • Boundary objects

    The emerging concept of boundary objects in knowledge management

    6 December 2019 / Bruce Boyes
  • Co-Creation

    Co-creative approaches to knowledge production and implementation series (part 11): An experimental evaluation tool for the Public Innovation Lab of the Uruguayan government

    5 December 2019 / Bruce Boyes
  • AI and CI

    How collective intelligence and AI can make citizens’ lives better

    4 December 2019 / Adi Gaskell
  • Popular
  • Top Rated
  • Comments
  • Components of a knowledge management system

    24680 views / Posted 3 February 2016
  • Extended technology acceptance model (TAM2) [Personality & TKMS series]

    14862 views / Posted 24 August 2016
  • How to meet the requirements of ISO 9001:2015 Clause 7.1.6 Organisational knowledge

    12934 views / Posted 6 October 2015
  • What is the scope of knowledge management? [EKM series]

    12861 views / Posted 14 December 2015
  • Trends, issues and challenges in knowledge management and sharing: research review

    11937 views / Posted 17 February 2016
  • The network science of career success

    3 September 2015 / Bruce Boyes
  • How to meet the requirements of ISO 9001:2015 Clause 7.1.6 Organisational knowledge

    6 October 2015 / Bruce Boyes
  • If you ignore diversity, you aren’t serious about performance

    28 October 2015 / Stephen Bounds
  • Amsterdam uses the crowd to power its smart city

    4 November 2015 / Adi Gaskell
  • Paris terror attacks: exploring the mainstream and social media reaction

    16 November 2015 / Bruce Boyes
  • avatar
    Neetu Choudhary on Looking at knowledge management from a knowledge…Amazing article, very informative. Thank…
  • avatar
    Bruce Boyes on The interplay between knowledge and powerEditor's note: Replies to Richard's…
  • avatar
    Chris Warren-Adamson on Exploring the science of complexity series (part…Is there any software that…
  • avatar
    linda on The worst mental health killer you probably…They might as well pulled…
  • avatar
    Richard Vines on The interplay between knowledge and powerInteresting blog Cristina Zurbriggen. Thanks…

Editor’s Picks

  • Mott MacDonald extends connected thinking with Microsoft 365

    Microsoft’s Project Cortex brings AI to knowledge management

    6 November 2019 / Bruce Boyes
  • A daily Scrum team helps people control workload and schedule

    Does discomfort help to explain the effectiveness of agile and other incremental / cyclic methods?

    17 October 2019 / Bruce Boyes
  • Case studies in complexity (part 5): Queensland land clearing campaign

    4 October 2019 / Bruce Boyes
  • Stages of KM maturity

    What does the research say about knowledge management maturity models?

    13 September 2019 / Bruce Boyes
  • Why the concept of “valuing” knowledge and information can be misleading

    22 August 2019 / Patrick Lambe

Browse More Stories

  • Systems and complexity
  • Brain power
  • ABCs of KM
  • In the news
  • Opinion
  • Tools & tech
Avatars by Sterling Adventures

© 2015-19 RealKM Cooperative Limited. Privacy Statement

Menu

x

RealKM Magazine is made possible by the generous support of our great Patrons! Find out how you can become a RealKM Patron too!