complex
-
Taking responsibility for complexity
Taking responsibility for complexity
This series explores how implementation can achieve results in the face of complex problems.
-
Core principles of responsible KM (rKM)
Developing the core principles of responsible knowledge management (rKM): Chapter 3 – Research framework
The study of rKM requires a framework that accommodates its conceptual complexity, interdisciplinary nature, and emergent status.
-
Core principles of responsible KM (rKM)
Developing the core principles of responsible knowledge management (rKM): Section 2.8.2 – Post-normal science: ethics for complex systems
KM in this frame is about navigating interdependence, plurality, and responsibility.
-
Core principles of responsible KM (rKM)
Developing the core principles of responsible knowledge management (rKM): Section 2.8.1 – Systems thinking in practice: wicked problems
“Wicked problems” is a concept that exposes the futility of treating complex, pluralistic societal issues as solvable puzzles with optimal…
-
Core principles of responsible KM (rKM)
Developing the core principles of responsible knowledge management (rKM): Section 2.8 – Affirming life: systems thinking as ethical worldview
A reductionist, mechanistic worldview still dominates thinking in the human sciences, including KM.
-
KM Triversary Forum 2025
Keynote – Where do knowledge management and Integration and Implementation Sciences intersect? [Forum special series]
KM Triversary Forum keynote presentation article by Professor Gabriele Bammer.
-
In the know
In the know: 1. Guidebook for Deliberative Engagement | 2. Surfacing Worldviews of Change
In the know is a regular roundup of knowledge management (KM) items of interest.
-
News & community
Happy 10th birthday i2Insights! Celebrating a living toolkit for tackling complex problems
I'm greatly honoured to be one of the i2Insights Ambassadors!
-
Systems & complexity
Six elements of effective co-design
What does co-design for tackling complex challenges look like in practice?
-
Systems & complexity
Harnessing the collision of four ways of knowing
How can solving today’s most complex challenges reckon with four fundamentally different ways of knowing?