predatory
-
Quality of science & its communication
What might peer review look like in 2030?
Recommendations and a range of perspectives on the future of peer review in scientific publishing.
-
Quality of science & its communication
Predatory journals recruit ‘Dr. Fraud’
Dozens of predatory journals were ready and willing to offer an unqualified fake scientist a place on their editorial boards.
-
Quality of science & its communication
How to tell the difference between potential predatory and legitimate journals
A new study identifies 13 evidence-based characteristics by which predatory journals may potentially be distinguished from presumed legitimate ones.
-
Open access perspectives
Open access trends: the good, the bad, and the irony
Journal publishers are initiating content sharing and agreeing to open access demands, but the predatory journal problem is on the…
