ABCs of KMCore principles of responsible KM (rKM)Evidence for KM practice

Developing the core principles of responsible knowledge management (rKM): Chapter 4 – Findings

This article introduces Chapter 4 of a series featuring my Master’s thesis The Emerging Concept of Responsible Knowledge Management (rKM): Identifying and Formulating the Core Principles of rKM.

Based on the categorisation of the final sample, the research revealed a collection of sources that, while diverse in format and methodological emphasis, remained broadly consistent in their conceptual ambitions. The sample did not cohere around a single disciplinary approach or uniform methodology but was nonetheless held together by a shared concern for rethinking KM in light of emerging ethical, ecological, and societal challenges. This thematic coherence offset the structural heterogeneity of the material.

The sections of Chapter 4 are:

  • 4.1 – Characteristics of the sample
  • 4.2 – Observations from the Scopus search
  • 4.3 – Observations from the Google Scholar search
  • 4.4 – Distribution of the sample
  • 4.5 – Findings of the integrative literature review
  • 4.6 – Conceptual constraints and neoliberal residues
  • 4.7 – Grounded theory findings: A framework for rKM
    • 4.7.1 – Normative frameworks guiding rKM
    • 4.7.2 – Inclusivity
    • 4.7.3 – Sustainable ecosystem view
    • 4.7.4 – A relational model of rKM

Next part: Section 4.1 – Characteristics of the sample.

Article source: Koskinen, H. M. (2025). The Emerging Concept of Responsible Knowledge Management (rKM): Identifying and Formulating the Core Principles of rKM. (Master’s Thesis, LUT University).

Header image source: Created by Hanna M. Koskinen using ChatGPT.

Hanna M. Koskinen

Hanna M. Koskinen is a knowledge management scholar and public-sector practitioner with almost two decades of experience coordinating services across organisational and cultural contexts. She holds an MSc in Knowledge Management and Leadership and a Master of Arts in English Philology. Her research interests span responsible knowledge management (rKM), ethics and sustainability in KM, systems thinking, and cross-cultural communication. Drawing on an interdisciplinary background in the humanities and business studies, her work explores how knowledge practices can move beyond efficiency-driven models toward more inclusive, reflective, and purpose-oriented approaches that contribute to the common good.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button