ABCs of KMCore principles of responsible KM (rKM)Evidence for KM practice

Developing the core principles of responsible knowledge management (rKM): Chapter 3 – Research framework

This article introduces Chapter 3 of a series featuring my Master’s thesis The Emerging Concept of Responsible Knowledge Management (rKM): Identifying and Formulating the Core Principles of rKM.

The study of rKM requires a framework that accommodates its conceptual complexity, interdisciplinary nature, and emergent status. As a concept that challenges traditional KM paradigms, rKM calls for an approach that synthesises knowledge, highlighting aspects that differ.

This thesis is positioned within the theoretical, qualitative research tradition that accentuates the interpretative nature of knowledge construction. The methodological choices reflect the researcher’s desire to discover the core principles of rKM by identifying emergent codes, categories and concepts through an integrative literature review (ILR) and grounded theory (GT) analysis of specific academic texts.

This chapter outlines the ontological and epistemological positioning of the thesis before detailing the methodological choices employed.

The sections of Chapter 3 are:

Next part: Sections 3.1 & 3.2 – Ontological and epistemological foundations & methodological approach.

Article source: Koskinen, H. M. (2025). The Emerging Concept of Responsible Knowledge Management (rKM): Identifying and Formulating the Core Principles of rKM. (Master’s Thesis, LUT University).

Header image source: Created by Hanna M. Koskinen using ChatGPT.

Hanna M. Koskinen

Hanna M. Koskinen is a knowledge management scholar and public-sector practitioner with almost two decades of experience coordinating services across organisational and cultural contexts. She holds an MSc in Knowledge Management and Leadership and a Master of Arts in English Philology. Her research interests span responsible knowledge management (rKM), ethics and sustainability in KM, systems thinking, and cross-cultural communication. Drawing on an interdisciplinary background in the humanities and business studies, her work explores how knowledge practices can move beyond efficiency-driven models toward more inclusive, reflective, and purpose-oriented approaches that contribute to the common good.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button