ABCs of KMCore principles of responsible KM (rKM)

Developing the core principles of responsible knowledge management (rKM): Section 1.4 – The structure of the research and this series

This article is Section 1.4 of a series featuring my Master’s thesis The Emerging Concept of Responsible Knowledge Management (rKM): Identifying and Formulating the Core Principles of rKM.

Research strategy

The research strategy employed in my thesis reflects a layered approach. As illustrated in Figure 1, this strategy draws on two methods, part of the theoretical and qualitative traditions. An integrative literature review1 serves as the overarching umbrella for selecting and synthesising relevant academic discourse. Within this framework, grounded theory2 is used to analyse how rKM is described, conceptualised, and contextualised across different sources. Together, these methods support the construction of a conceptual framework that reflects both the current state of the field and its potential trajectories.

This layered strategy was an independent idea conceived specifically for the purposes of this thesis, combining methodological elements to best address the emergent nature of rKM. In the course of the research, no previous studies were encountered that applied this exact combination of integrative literature review and grounded theory to investigate emerging concepts. As such, the approach represents a novel contribution to the methodological exploration of the topic.

Research strategy: The emerging concept of rKM
Figure 1. Research strategy (source: Koskinen, 2025).

Information on the theoretical and empirical limitations of the research can be found in section 1.5 of the thesis.

Structure of this series

The following chapters are organised to guide the reader from context to contribution:

Chapter 2 provides a theoretical overview of the history of KM, outlining its commonly accepted purposes and the complexities that arise from them. It situates KM within broader intellectual traditions and highlights the limitations of its prevailing approaches, thereby contextualising why a more responsible orientation may be necessary.

Chapter 3 describes the research framework.

Chapter 4 presents the findings of the integrative literature review and grounded theory analysis, showing how key themes and principles of rKM emerge from the current discourse.

Chapter 5 interprets these findings, discussing their implications for the future of KM and situating them within wider scholarly and practical debates.

Finally, Chapter 6 offers conclusions, distilling the insights of the thesis and identifying directions for further research.

Next part: Chapter 2 – Theoretical foundations, evolution, and limits of knowledge management.

Article source: Koskinen, H. M. (2025). The Emerging Concept of Responsible Knowledge Management (rKM): Identifying and Formulating the Core Principles of rKM. (Master’s Thesis, LUT University).

Header image source: Created by Hanna M. Koskinen using ChatGPT.

References:

  1. The University of Melbourne. (n.d.). Integrative Review. Which review is that? A guide to review types: A typology of literature reviews.
  2. Wikipedia, CC BY-SA 4.0.

Hanna M. Koskinen

Hanna M. Koskinen is a knowledge management scholar and public-sector practitioner with almost two decades of experience coordinating services across organisational and cultural contexts. She holds an MSc in Knowledge Management and Leadership and a Master of Arts in English Philology. Her research interests span responsible knowledge management (rKM), ethics and sustainability in KM, systems thinking, and cross-cultural communication. Drawing on an interdisciplinary background in the humanities and business studies, her work explores how knowledge practices can move beyond efficiency-driven models toward more inclusive, reflective, and purpose-oriented approaches that contribute to the common good.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button