Artificial intelligenceBrain power

The AI Risk Repository: A comprehensive database of risks from AI systems

This article is part of an ongoing series looking at AI in KM, and KM in AI.

As reported in numerous articles in the long-running RealKM Magazine artificial intelligence (AI) series, while there are clear benefits that can flow from the use of AI in knowledge management (KM), there are associated risks that must be considered and addressed. However, the lack of a comprehensive assessment of AI risks has hampered the shared understandings needed to plan and implement appropriate responses.

The new MIT AI Risk Repository addresses this gap. It should become an essential tool and reference for the KM community as it moves forward with AI. An overview of the repository is presented in the video below.

As documented in a preprint1, an evidence-based approach has taken to developing the AI Risk Repository involving a systematic review, forwards and backwards searching, and expert consultation. This identified 43 AI risk classifications, frameworks, and taxonomies, from which 700+ risks were extracted into a living AI risk database that can be easily accessed, modified, and updated.

The AI Risk Repository database can be filtered based on two overarching taxonomies, the Causal Taxonomy of AI Risks and the Domain Taxonomy of AI Risks. A best fit framework synthesis2 approach was used to create these taxonomies.

The Causal Taxonomy of AI Risks classifies each risk by its causal factors:

  1. Entity: Human, AI.
  2. Intentionality: Intentional, Unintentional.
  3. Timing: Pre-deployment; Post-deployment.

The mid-level Domain Taxonomy of AI Risks classifies risks into seven AI risk domains:

  1. Discrimination & toxicity.
  2. Privacy & security.
  3. Misinformation.
  4. Malicious actors & misuse.
  5. Human-computer interaction.
  6. Socioeconomic & environmental.
  7. AI system safety, failures, & limitations.

These are further divided into 23 subdomains.

Acknowledgements: With thanks to Elizabeth (Liz) McLean, MSLS CKS for alerting me to the release of the AI Risk Repository.

Header image source: AI Risk Repository.

Reference:

  1. Slattery, P., Saeri, A. K., Grundy, E. A., Graham, J., Noetel, M., Uuk, R., … & Thompson, N. (2024). The AI Risk Repository: A Comprehensive Meta-Review, Database, and Taxonomy of Risks From Artificial Intelligence. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.12622.
  2. Carroll, C., Booth, A., Leaviss, J., & Rick, J. (2013). “Best fit” framework synthesis: refining the method. BMC medical research methodology, 13, 1-16.

Bruce Boyes

Bruce Boyes is editor, lead writer, and a director of RealKM Magazine and winner of the International Knowledge Management Award 2025 (Individual Category). He is an experienced knowledge manager, environmental manager, project manager, communicator, and educator, and holds a Master of Environmental Management with Distinction and a Certificate of Technology (Electronics). His many career highlights include: establishing RealKM Magazine as an award-winning resource with more than 2,500 articles and 5 million reader views, leading the knowledge management (KM) community KM and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) initiative, using agile approaches to oversee the on time and under budget implementation of an award-winning $77.4 million recovery program for one of Australia's iconic river systems, leading a knowledge strategy process for Australia’s 56 natural resource management (NRM) regional organisations, pioneering collaborative learning and governance approaches to empower communities to sustainably manage landscapes and catchments in the face of complexity, being one of the first to join a new landmark aviation complexity initiative, initiating and teaching two new knowledge management subjects at Shanxi University in China, and writing numerous notable environmental strategies, reports, and other works.

Related Articles

Back to top button